一人一信給韓國新任總統 阻止韓國成為立法開放食用狗肉的國家

[哈啦]

http://www.east.org.tw/01/link3-55.htm

[哈啦]

韓國總統辦公室(青瓦台)： [email protected]
韓國時報： [email protected]
韓國首爾市政府各辦公室：
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]

[哈啦]

Dear President Lee Myung-bak:

Greetings, and first of all congratulations on becoming the new president of Korea! While people all around the world have been paying close attention to the political and economic reforms you are promoting and to your political performance and achievements, we have heard a worrying, shocking piece of news – on the 24th of March this year Seoul Metropolitan Government announced a “Dog Meat Hygiene Management Policy”, which lists dogs as “livestock”! And it is also expected that, that after Korea’s parliamentary elections end in April, and after holding a related hearing in May, a proposal will be made immediately to the Central Government to amend the “Livestock Products Processing Act”, officially legislating that dog meat be listed as a livestock product. Therefore, animal protection groups from your country gathered in front of Seoul City Hall on March 25th and 26th to protest.

Korea’s hi-tech and electronic products are sold throughout the world, and the so-called “Korean Wave”, which includes all kinds of entertainment, food and tourism industries, has also greatly increased the interest of people all across Asia in Korea, helping characterize Korea as a country of great culture and originality. However, many people in Asia and the rest of the world see dogs as companions, and if you do indeed legislate that dogs are to be listed as “livestock”, this will make Korea the first country in the world to legalize dog meat consumption, and will make you the first national leader in the history of civilization to list dogs as “animals for consumption”! This will not only harm your country, it will also hurt all the people in the world who care about animal rights and civilized development. Our perception of the status and value of Korean culture and creativity, and of all Korean products, tourism and entertainment programs will suffer a great negative impact, and this may even lead to an “Anti-Korean Wave”!

Dogs are simply dogs, and no matter whether in biological theory or in real life, they are not divided into pet dogs, companion dogs and edible dogs. Taiwan, Hong Kong, the Philippines and Thailand have all already legally banned the consumption of dog meat. Although there are still a few countries and people in Asia who still consume dog meat, their living standards are, on average, far lower than those of Korea, and until now there has never been a country which has, through national law, legalized the act of eating dog meat!

People have raised dogs and cats as companions for at least twelve thousand years, and in the last 20 or 30 years, “anthrozoology” has gradually brought about a consensus: companion animals bring psychological and physical benefits to humans. They can give humans intimacy and support, alleviate the negative health impacts of stress, and also enhance people’s ability to prevent and resist disease. Modern day Criminal Sociology is also drawing the conclusion that there is a high degree of correlation between cruelty to animals and domestic violence and child abuse. Once dogs become animals that can be freely butchered for their meat, there will be unimaginable negative social and educational impacts on public psychology.

In the course of civilization, humans always reflect upon the many cruelties of nature. Amongst the issues of environmental protection, “meat” has already been labeled a high-carbon food, and livestock farming is a major source of greenhouse gases. In order to create a more humane society, and for the sake of the sustainability of human civilization, we as co-citizens of this planet hope with all sincerity that your government will under no circumstances make this mistaken decision, causing humanity take a step backwards on the road to civilized development, and at the same time impacting on Korea’s foreign trade development. In addition, we hope that your government can, as soon as possible, prohibit the consumption of dog meat, in order to enhance animal welfare in Korea.

[cool]

:mad: :mad: :mad:
Stop Korea from legalizing dog meat consumption

紅色加大字體寄出，待會網站上也會增加圖示連結。

[roger]

不知道 大家發送同樣的信件內容
會不會被韓國總統信箱的防廣告信軟體
丟到垃圾信件夾 :whoknows

若寄中文信
應可寄 [email protected]

[some]

狗真是幸福

牛可以養來吃
豬可以養來吃
雞也可以養來吃
就狗不能 @@

[ras0314]

為什麼食用狗肉還要立法?

我知道有的宗教不吃牛, 有的不吃豬....

還好...他們沒寫信寄到台灣叫我們禁食 ^^

[cool]

還好...他們沒寫信寄到台灣叫我們禁食 ^^
內容也不看一下。
韓國動保團體尋求亞洲社會協助！

[ras0314]

內容也不看一下。
韓國動保團體尋求亞洲社會協助！


我說的他們是指

不吃牛, 不吃豬 的那些人啦 ~pighead

[kam]

為什麼食用狗肉還要立法?

我知道有的宗教不吃牛, 有的不吃豬....

還好...他們沒寫信寄到台灣叫我們禁食 ^^


小弟猜可能這是因為社會有反對聲音, 所以政府才立法表明立場...

------

[cool]

內文應該很清楚當地動保組織，欲尋求臨近國家的國際輿論壓力，也就即將發生的事。
很單純，身為愛狗人士，舉手之勞。

作了幾張圖示，歡迎自由引用。

120x90
http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/4905/stop3jq6.jpg

150x150
http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/9221/stop2je8.jpg

468x60
http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/2092/stop1ht4.jpg

[暗夜]

该吃还得吃 不该吃的还是不能吃 养好自己的狗 让别人吃别人的去吧

[無法無天]

會吃的人 無論有沒有立法 都是會去吃的吧
很多保育類動物 還不是有一堆人在那吃
我覺得 還是從教育做起會比較好

[未註冊]

韓國人都是野蠻人嗎?
丟臉丟到世界 !

[路人甲]

不會吧!?如果大韓政府為了圖一時香(?)肉而大舉屠殺狗民的話，那真的是名符其實的「掛韓頭、賣狗肉」了!國家的經濟正要旺旺的時候，偏偏政府的道德水準及還沒到那裡，這可是會得到狂犬病的，聽過有一位大師級的人物說過:「當國家的科技經濟發達，而政府人民道德水準還沒到那裡的時候，是會自取毀滅的」，這句話相當有深度;如果大韓的政府真的立法了，我看諾貝爾和平獎也可以去寒(韓)了啦~

[bugmac]

我要講另一回事
我覺得養狗的人要自愛一點倒是真的
台灣的養狗人沒品的真的很多
沒事牽著狗到處大小便
還一副理所當然的樣子
不然就養大型犬 在路上到處亂溜 從來沒有看到幫狗戴口罩的
別說這種人很少 滿街都是 不然就是我運氣好 特別容易遇到這種人
養寵物是自由 但別妨礙他人自由
你的狗兒子狗女兒在你眼中是很可愛
但對別人來說可能是種妨礙
尤其是半夜亂叫的時候
俗話說的好:打狗看主人
你要揍那隻狗 先看看那隻狗的主人
那狗管不好 主人當然是問題的根源

[best-url]

一人一封信 阻止韓國開放吃狗肉
更新日期:2008/04/09 08:00 記者朱淑娟台北報導

http://tw.news.yahoo.com/article/url/d/a/080409/2/wxsl.html


「我不好吃、請不要吃我！」韓國首爾市日前宣布要把狗列為「食用家畜」，讓吃狗肉合法化。台灣、韓國環保團體昨天聯手痛批韓國是「亞洲最不文明的國家」，將串聯亞洲各國一人一信阻止野蠻立法。


台灣動物社會研究會執行長朱增宏說，首爾政府合法化吃狗表面上的理由是基於衛生管理。但他認為這只是藉口，首爾政府要先檢討是否落實衛生管理。他呼籲韓國總統李明博不要做「不文明的總統」。


朱增宏說，人類無論如何不應將狗視為可以吃的動物，包括台灣、香港等地都已禁止吃狗肉，已擁有經濟優勢的南韓還將吃狗合法化，令人匪夷所思。


韓國長久以來有吃狗肉的習慣，政府放任肉狗飼養場以不人道的方式養狗、殺狗、市場上光天化日賣血淋淋的狗。環保團體昨天公布錄影帶，肉狗飼養場環境髒亂，狗只能擠在非常小的空間埵Y廚餘、發霉的麵包，母狗被強迫配種兩、三胎後就被屠宰，慘不忍睹。


韓國維護地球動物協會代表朴素妍昨天氣憤表示，李明博上台後面對狗肉問題，「退化到未開化的原始時代」。韓國現有一千萬人口飼養狗，如立法成功，未來可能會有更多家犬被棄養，流落到狗肉市場，狗肉市場將更加猖獗。


雖然政府承諾只能吃飼養的肉狗、不會吃寵物，但朴素妍質疑一九八四年首爾市就明訂狗肉是不潔的食物，禁止流通，但政府並未取締不法販狗的業者，任由每年兩百萬隻狗被屠殺。現為了規避責任乾脆把吃狗合法化，「荒謬可惡」。


台灣動物社會研究會發起一人一信給韓國總統李明博、首爾市長吳世勳，民眾可到網站發信http://www.east.org.tw/01/link3-55.htm

[kuekhh]

www.east.org.tw 流量大概爆掉了
我從週三下午連到週四凌晨都連不到 :XD:

[cool]

臨近的香港，對動物保護的電視宣導教育，相對比台灣還積極。
http://www.isd.gov.hk/chi/tvapi/06_ag17.html

台灣現行動物保護法，花個十分鐘閱覽一下。
http://www.coa.gov.tw/show_lawcommond.php?cat=show_lawcommond&type=A&serial=9_cikuo_20040915105337&code=A09

[domainplayer]

我的站上也有人對此議題發表了看法與投票,
有興趣的版友也歡迎參加討論:
http://www.openbook.info/showthread.php?t=503

[some]

口口聲聲保護動物

在座的各位除了狗以外還不是大部分都吃

這麼在乎保護動物, 為何不吃素, 在小弟看來這些種種的一切都是一種偽善.
各種動物一樣都是生命, 就因為物種的不懂而有貴賤之分, 因為人類的喜好, 有的動物還需要特別花費數億蓋園區供民眾展覽, 人類阿...

可憐的雞 豬 牛, 生來就該死該被殺來吃.

我個人對於養 "肉狗" 保持開放態度, 專門養來吃的肉狗已經定義牠的命運, 有法律的管制才能避免私下工廠的宰殺 品質才有保障.

[cool]

扯太遠了！

二個看法：
一. 必須先搞清楚，你現在居住在什麼樣的國家地區，你必須遵守什麼樣的法規？！
認為法規不通人情，認為『肉狗』可宰殺來吃，組一團出面去抗議要求修法吧，不要躲在這只剩一張嘴。
放心吧！我一定站在你對面，面向你。


二. 事件原委需釐清！
他國的內政、文化、習俗、信仰教條或禁忌，任何國家都無權利『主動』去干涉及抨擊。

這事件由韓國動物保護組織，向亞洲區相同社會組織尋求協助- 即『被動』協助，亦是民間非官方！
試問人家有要求中華民國政府協助嗎？有要求全國公民協助嗎？有要求你一定要協助嗎？

再則，阻止說帖信件內文請再看清楚一點，內文是否提及是以代表中華民國全公民進行抨擊阻止嗎？

國與國的民間組織可以互相協助、伸出援手吧？！